So, not a long post, but something that came up when I asked folk what they’d like me to write about. Two things that came up that I think are interrelated, Accountability and Stewardship. This is going to lean more heavily on the latter, but don’t worry I’ll bop out a post on accountability at a later date.
There is some confusion about how the ELCA is funded, and it
is related to our church being three expressions. Some folk assume we’re funded
in a top down model—there is a collective pot of money that the National Church
doles out to Synods and congregations. That’s not how the ELCA works. There are
other denominations and other expressions of Lutheranism that do this kind of
thing, but currently that isn’t the ELCA’s model.
Instead, our ideal looks like this:
-Parishioners give a portion of their income to their
congregation. The ideal is a “tithe”, which is 10%.
-Then every congregation sends 10% of that on as a
gift to the Synod.
-The Synod then in turn sends 50% of what they
receive from congregations on to the Churchwide expression of this
church.
What does this have to do with accountability, you may ask. One of the pet peeves of a certain segment of clergy is that from time-to-time Churchwide solicits donations from individual congregants (I’ve participated in this without giving it a second thought). Decoupling funding streams from the relationships between expressions can make the expressions of the church less accountable to one another.
For example, if Chris Halverson loves Young Adults in Global Mission (YAGM)
and sends money to Churchwide for that ministry, that bypasses congregations
and synods voicing what they see as important. At an extreme, the national
church could become a subsidiary of YAGM, while congregations and Synods
cry out, “we need to take care of the elderly,” and it just doesn’t get
done.
No comments:
Post a Comment