As I stated last time, one of the reasons Andrew Sullivan’s
blog was so good, was that he commented on EVERYTHING (same reason St.
Augustine was so good, but that’s another story). One of the ways he commented
on everything was soliciting five links a day from one of his contributors. So,
I decided that on an irregular basis I’d try my hand at commenting on five
links. Without further adieu here they are!
Kevin Drum of Mother Jones mentions that Scott Walker, if he becomes the
Republican Candidate, will be the most conservative nominee since Barry
Goldwater. Then the article goes on to mention that Walker’s Midwestern nature hides
this fact. That got me thinking about how folk in New Jersey talk about Chris
Christie’s chances at becoming the Republican nominee. Essentially, they argue
he’s quite liberal, but he’s Jersey tough, maybe even Jersey mean—and meanness
can be confused with being conservative.
Think about that for a second. Walker, despite being very
conservative, could get the nod because he’s Midwestern nice. Christie, despite
being relatively liberal, could get the nod because he’s Jersey mean. Weird.
John Dickerson pointed to Vice President Joe Biden’s recent
comment that the next Democratic nominee for president will essentially be
running for President Obama’s third term. In other words, “If by third term you
mean another 59 months of continuous job growth and falling unemployment, then
yes, I’ll be a third term.”
Dickerson doesn’t think this is a good idea for Hillary, who
he assumes will be the Democratic Party Nominee. He points out that voters
almost always prefer the new to the old… just ask Al Gore about offering
America an era of peace and prosperity, a continuation of the 1990’s. I suppose
in that way Americans are just like the Athenians, we’re always chasing after
something new (Acts 17:21).
Continuing to engage with “Obama’s Niebuhr moment” Douthat
cautions conservatives from responding to the President’s non-nuanced reference
to the Crusades with even more lack of nuance. Essentially Douthat argues that
by rushing to answer the President conservatives have, “produced a lot of
arguments that effectively whitewash Christian history, minimize the harge reality
of pogroms and persecutions, and otherwise present fat targets for secular
eye-rolling.”
So, LutheranCORE, a “reform” group within the ELCA that
often times tries to convince ELCA churches to leave the denomination over our
“liberal” stance on Gay folk, as well as our willingness to play nice with the
Episcopal Church, did an epic troll. That is, no one was paying attention to
what they have to say, so they said something really offensive in order to get
attention—it’s the internet version of throwing a temper tantrum.
Bishop Mike Rinehart of the Texas Louisiana Gulf Coast Synod
recently wrote an open letter to the LGBT community in response to a Lutheran
Church Missouri Synod (the 2nd largest Lutheran denomination in the USA)
school expelling a student for coming out of the closet. His post was a pastoral letter addressing a
local issue within the confines of his Synod where, because of that news, Lutherans were becoming synonymous with anti-gay bigots.
CORE responded, by issuing their own “Open Letter” to gay
folk, in which they purposefully misread the ELCA’s statement on Human
Sexuality, and state, on behalf of the ELCA, that gay people are in fact not
welcome in the ELCA. They did so repeating key phrases and words so that their
statement will pop up first when people look up ELCA, LGBT, and open letter… in
other words, if there are gay people and their families hurt by Lutherans, who
want to search out this open letter by Bishop Rinehart, they will instead find
a letter of unwelcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment